Docs / Reference

Malformed input

Return input_schema_validation_failed when a manifest, invocation envelope, or payload is missing required protocol fields.

Plain English

This failure mode should return a structured protocol record with input_schema_validation_failed, not an ambiguous framework or transport failure.

Why it exists

Independent callers need to branch on predictable protocol outcomes when a capability cannot safely execute.

Formal definition

A failure mode is a first-class protocol outcome with a stable denial.code or error.code, message, optional details, and evidence semantics.

Concrete example

Ground the concept before the schema.

The invocation omits subject or sends payload.window as a number when the capability requires a string.

malformed-input.outcome.json
json
{  "invocation_id": "inv_malformed_001",  "capability_id": "schedule_technician",  "capability_version": "1.0.0",  "correlation": { "correlation_id": "case-malformed" },  "outcome": "denied",  "success": false,  "data": null,  "error": null,  "denial": {    "code": "input_schema_validation_failed",    "message": "Invocation envelope is missing subject.",    "retryable": true,    "details": { "field": "subject" }  },  "evidence_ids": ["evt_malformed_denied"],  "started_at": null,  "completed_at": "2026-06-16T15:14:22.104Z"}

Developer reference

Malformed input outcome contract

Use this as the minimum machine-readable shape for tests and independent callers.

FieldValueMeaning
triggercondition

The invocation omits subject or sends payload.window as a number when the capability requires a string.

denial.code or error.codeinput_schema_validation_failed

Invocation envelope is missing subject.

event_typeexecution_denied

Evidence type or absence expected for this failure.

Relationships

Where this sits in the protocol.

Each concept should explain its neighbors so implementation teams can preserve the boundary across manifests, invocation, evidence, and tests.

Failure outcomes are produced during discovery, validation, authorization, lifecycle checks, execution, or timeout handling.

Evidence should record the decision path when an invocation reaches the host boundary.

Conformance should include both this failure and the neighboring happy path.

Visual model

  1. 01Caller sends or discovers a protocol surface.
  2. 02Host or infrastructure detects the failure condition.
  3. 03Caller receives input_schema_validation_failed with structured details.

Implementation notes

  • Return a stable code that callers can match programmatically.
  • Include a human-readable message without depending on it for control flow.
  • Attach evidence when the host boundary received and evaluated the request.

Common mistakes

  • Throwing a raw exception instead of a protocol outcome.
  • Using different codes for the same failure across hosts.
  • Omitting evidence for denied or rejected requests that reached policy or lifecycle checks.

Related concepts

Keep reading through the boundary.