Docs / Reference

Timeout

Return timeout when execution exceeds host timeout policy after the invocation boundary accepts the request.

Plain English

This failure mode should return a structured protocol record with timeout, not an ambiguous framework or transport failure.

Why it exists

Independent callers need to branch on predictable protocol outcomes when a capability cannot safely execute.

Formal definition

A failure mode is a first-class protocol outcome with a stable denial.code or error.code, message, optional details, and evidence semantics.

Concrete example

Ground the concept before the schema.

ServiceOpsHost accepts the invocation and cannot complete scheduling inside its configured execution window.

timeout.outcome.json
json
{  "invocation_id": "inv_timeout_001",  "capability_id": "schedule_technician",  "capability_version": "1.0.0",  "correlation": { "correlation_id": "case-timeout" },  "outcome": "failure",  "success": false,  "data": null,  "error": {    "code": "timeout",    "message": "schedule_technician exceeded host timeout policy.",    "details": { "timeout_ms": 3000 }  },  "denial": null,  "evidence_ids": ["evt_timeout_failed"],  "started_at": "2026-06-16T15:14:20.000Z",  "completed_at": "2026-06-16T15:14:23.000Z"}

Developer reference

Timeout outcome contract

Use this as the minimum machine-readable shape for tests and independent callers.

FieldValueMeaning
triggercondition

ServiceOpsHost accepts the invocation and cannot complete scheduling inside its configured execution window.

denial.code or error.codetimeout

schedule_technician exceeded host timeout policy.

event_typeexecution_failed

Evidence type or absence expected for this failure.

Relationships

Where this sits in the protocol.

Each concept should explain its neighbors so implementation teams can preserve the boundary across manifests, invocation, evidence, and tests.

Failure outcomes are produced during discovery, validation, authorization, lifecycle checks, execution, or timeout handling.

Evidence should record the decision path when an invocation reaches the host boundary.

Conformance should include both this failure and the neighboring happy path.

Visual model

  1. 01Caller sends or discovers a protocol surface.
  2. 02Host or infrastructure detects the failure condition.
  3. 03Caller receives timeout with structured details.

Implementation notes

  • Return a stable code that callers can match programmatically.
  • Include a human-readable message without depending on it for control flow.
  • Attach evidence when the host boundary received and evaluated the request.

Common mistakes

  • Throwing a raw exception instead of a protocol outcome.
  • Using different codes for the same failure across hosts.
  • Omitting evidence for denied or rejected requests that reached policy or lifecycle checks.

Related concepts

Keep reading through the boundary.